Marlene Dumas: Eerie and Strange

Marlene Dumas interests me as an artist because of the peculiarity of her work.  It is strange, eerie, and often discomfiting.

I have always been attracted to portraiture and I think that Dumas’s portraits are exciting because of how different they are.  Her water images are haunting and powerful, and her clear interest in depicting emotion and individuality through these images is enticing.  She gives each person their own space on the paper, but then, in this recent exhibition, she then crowds all the faces together in a grid-like pattern, each person become one of many.  I find this shift interesting in relation to the history of portraiture, where it is often used to celebrate or glorify a single person. Here, in the work of Dumas, each individual just becomes lost in the crowd.  I’m interested in her use of materials, her application of paint, and her approach to portraiture and the body.  I found a quote on her website that I am eager to delve into and unpack.  She said that ”no painting can exist without the tension of what it figures and what it concretely consists of—the pleasure of what it could mean and the pain of what it’s not.”

2 thoughts on “Marlene Dumas: Eerie and Strange

  1. I love how you focused on the way Dumas makes portraits less intimate and personal by having them be seen amongst and around each other. It takes away the personalized aspect and allows and group examination. Each one of them is a person of mystery to the viewer, so it’s really interesting to see how enticing they are alone and how the mystery increases or decreases based on being surrounded by other portraits.

  2. I was really struck by her portraits when we had to research her! I am also super interested in the medium she uses. The effect of the watercolor or ink she uses and how it spreads out and smudges, is extremely haunting and portrays emotion really effectively.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *